Preprint article: Libraries, AI, and the Age of Consequences

Libraries, AI, and the Age of Consequences (preprint: html / PDF) is the title of an invited article I’ve just completed for the MDPI journal Future Collections, Libraries, Archives, Museums.

This paper is an expanded and refined version of the keynote address delivered at the World Library Forum at Peking University in Beijing, May 2026, and while it follows the “Age of Consequences” logic/rationale that I’ve been working on for the last year or so this paper is unique in two regards.

First, in addition to the other drivers of revolution, rupture, and Consequences I’ve been putting on the table (climate, biodiversity, AI & computer science, biotech…), I try to document and weave together instances in which libraries, museums, and other memory/knowledge institutions are under assault in the USA and abroad; and second, I’ve gone a little deeper into my working hypothesis about the ways in which AI is “driving a wedge” between librarians and citizens/learners; and how library leaders and practitioners can avoid a series of “thinking traps” that are, in my experience, interfering with our strategic sense-making and foresight.

As I conclude:

From Benjamin Franklin’s creation of the subscription library to Thomas Jefferson’s conviction that a self-governing republic requires an informed populace, the baseline mission of librarianship has always been the protection of open, human epistemic agency. This principle lies at the heart of the cultural professions, and is enshrined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and explicitly codified in Target 16.10 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals—a target secured through global advocacy by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. If we think of AI purely as an efficiency tool or a type of seemingly neutral, off-the-shelf software—or even worse, if we reason that we are unprepared or unfit, as a sector, to defend these principles—we abdicate our stewardship of knowledge, culture, and memory to others.

This related essay, Youth, Megacities, and Culture in the Age of Consequences (Expanded Liverpool Thesis), is a preprint “author’s original manuscript” for a chapter in a forthcoming book about children’s museums. Here, I go deep on the drivers and consequences of rupture and revolution, including the importance of young people, megacities, and museums & cultural institutions as “places of appearance” (per Hannah Arendt).


New Essay — Youth, Megacities, and Culture in the Age of Consequences (Expanded Liverpool Thesis)

I just completed this draft essay / book chapter (below), which explores our obligations as global citizens and museum practitioners at a moment of extraordinary change—an Age of Consequences and cultural revolution.

I’ve been wrestling these ideas to the ground for almost a year now, since preparing for a talk I gave at the 2025 Children in Museums conference in Liverpool (hence the “Liverpool Thesis”), and this my most thorough and detailed effort so far, with a long bibliography and a long-long list of citations.

Note that this is my unedited, Author’s Original Manuscript (AOM) for a chapter in a book to be published in 2027 by IKTF, the Institute for Cultural Participation Research / Instituts für kulturelle Teilhabeforschung and Transcript Verlag, Germany. The book is an anthology from the 2025 “Children in Museums” Connected Audience conference in Liverpool, England, with a working title of Culture & Young People – What Could Possibly Go Wrong? The anthology will be edited by Vera Allmanritter and Julia Glesner.

This essay is CC-BY-NC-SA Michael Peter Edson, August 23, 2026.

Here’s the Intro below, then you can jump to the full story

Introduction

At the 2023 opening gala for the Museum of Solutions in Mumbai (MuSo) I approached a middle-aged guest and asked how he was enjoying the evening.

“I am angry,” he told me. “This museum is a jewel, but where were you 30 years ago when I was a child? And where are you now in the thousands of other places where a museum like this is needed?”

I was surprised and inspired by his response. Surprised, because few people expect a children’s museum to have such significance; and inspired because I felt he had perfectly sensed our purpose and ambitions and he felt they were too small. And I agree with his assessment: indeed, where are we — our sector, broadly writ, of children’s museums and all museums at a moment of extraordinary human and planetary change? Why build a children’s museum in Mumbai at all, or any museum in a world beset by social, technological, and environmental challenges?

Museums evolve in response changes in society. In the 1820s, visitors to the British Museum underwent rigorous personal vetting by the Director before earning a quick, supervised visit to the collection (Bryson 2025). Two centuries later, the British Museum has a different entry scheme and a different role in the world. But if the purpose and methods of the museum have always been fluid, the question now is whether we can get museum practice and practitioners to change quickly enough to meet a moment of breathtaking biological and socio-technical rupture.

This essay lays out a five-point thesis regarding our current moment in human culture and planetary systems, exploring our obligations as global citizens and museum practitioners, particularly within the discipline of children’s museums:

  1. We are in the middle of anew kind of cultural revolution — an “Age of Consequences” where the compounding effects of choices made across social, technological, and natural systems are becoming the predominant driver of human events.

  2. This revolution and rupture is unfolding everywhere, but it is most acutely seen and addressed in megacities and on the “Global Street.”

  3. Third, within this landscape, young people must be recognized and supported as consequential civic actors with unique rights, stature, and capabilities. This conceptualization of youth is growing globally, and is linked to the “rights of nature” and the “rights of future generations.”

  4. Legacy cultural institutions are structurally “deranged”— hamstrung by twentieth-century habits that leave them ill-equipped to act as authentic allies to youth or relate to the hyper-velocity of rupture beyond their doors.

  5. Museums, libraries, and knowledge/memory institutions must transform themselves into “places of appearance” that constitute the human process of natality (societal rebirth), acting as sites of imagination and renewal where new generations can manifest their agency through speech, presence, and action.

The acceleration of change and the perceived closing off of promising futures have cast new light on rights and capabilities of young people. While the Museum of Solutions (MuSo) in Mumbai was my first direct leadership role in a children’s museum, the experience solidified my belief that this sub-discipline deserves greater visibility and higher stakes. I believe museums, libraries, and other cultural, scientific, and performing arts organizations must now view themselves as essential components of a global response to the Age of Consequences and the project of building a more just, sustainable, and joyous world, with particular attention to the rights and capabilities of young people.

I write this essay not as an academic but as a cultural practitioner, maker, and doer. This perspective is informed by a career dedicated to increasing the openness and democratic vibrancy of cultural institutions and advancing the right to culture, as framed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which includes the right to access and contribute to the cultural and scientific life of the community (United Nations General Assembly 1948). This right is more than symbolic: it is at the heart of our capacity to understand the world we are living in and to make good decisions regarding its future.

Continue reading (jumps to new page)…

Note: this related article, Libraries, AI, and the Age of Consequences, follows a similar thesis but goes into greater depth regarding epistemic attacks on the cultural sector and the posture of libraries and other cultural/knowledge institutions regarding AI.


‘AI natives’

“As one New York financier told Financial Times journalist Gillian Tett, new hires who were seen as ‘AI natives’ are turning out to have alarmingly shallow ideas. So much so, the anonymous finance worker admitted, that his firm now actively avoids seeking out AI-literate STEM graduates, and opts to comb through humanities students instead.”
Bosses Horrified as “AI Native” College Graduates Hit the Workplace by Joe Wilkins. Futurism.com, drawing on a paywalled aricle from Financial Times. May 9, 2026.

Struggling

“We need [the museum] now because we are in a time of history where the structures, both the UN itself but also the governance structures generally across the world, are struggling. We have systems that are no longer as relevant and as impactful and as ready to take on the problems of today. And [the] UN Live [museum] could be and should be a tool to help rectify that. The way we rectify that is by creating a dialogue — not just between politicians and diplomats but between them and the people that were supposed to serve. And I think it’s incredibly important that those people, every single one of us somehow, has a way to get to the table where decisions are taken.”

— U.N. Under Secretary Michael Møller. UN Museum visioning workshop. Copenhagen, March 2015.

Libraries, AI, and the Age of Consequences 图书馆、人工智能与后果时代

Slides and references for my keynote at the World Library Form, Peking University. Beijing, China (May 2026)

  • Slides (Google Slides | PDF )

  • Reference slides (a longer set of 200+ slides with examples, frameworks, and solutions — from a talk I gave in Liverpool in November, 2025: Youth, Megacities, and the New Museums of the Future)

  • Transcript and conference proceedings (TBA)

Libraries: Cathedrals of Our Souls

Everything I am is based on this ugly building on its lonely lawn--lit up during winter darkness; open in the slashing rain--which allowed a girl so poor she didn't even own a purse to come in twice a day and experience actual magic: traveling through time, making contact with the dead--Dorothy Parker, Stella Gibbons, Charlotte Brontë, Spike Milligan.

A library in the middle of a community is a cross between an emergency exit, a life raft and a festival.

No new libraries will be built to replace them. These libraries will be lost forever.

And, in their place, we will have thousands more public spaces where you are simply the money in your pocket, rather than the hunger in your heart. Kids--poor kids--will never know the fabulous, benign quirk of self-esteem of walking into "their" library and thinking, "I have read 60 percent of the books in here. I am awesome." Libraries that stayed open during the Blitz will be closed by budgets.

A trillion small doors closing.
Caitlin Moran, Libraries: Cathedrals of Our Souls, 2012

University of Liverpool Museums & Libraries AI conference

A quick post/URL for slides related to Thursday’s Liverpool University Museums & Libraries AI conference.

The Liverpool Thesis: What drives "culture" at a moment of extraordinary Change?

Downloads

//

This is a fleshed-out version of a set of slides I first started working on for the Hands On! Children in Museums conference in Liverpool, England in November, 2025.

Basically, I am asserting that thinking about the world now from the perspective of young people gives us clearer insight into the revolution, disruption, and “derangement” (a term from Amitav Ghosh: our inability to grasp the scale of the climate crisis through our current cultural forms) we now face together.

…And from this perspective it’s easier to see how institutions (such as “culture”, knowledge, memory…) must now be “places of appearance” — a term from Hannah Arendt — where a people can constitute their agency to build a better world.

Here’s the thesis, in a nutshell:

  1. Cultural Revolution — We are living in the middle of a cultural revolution, not yet usefully described in the public sphere, that is driving a wedge between citizens (adults), young people, and a future that is joyous, sustainable and just. 

  2. Ruptures – The cultural revolution consists of ruptures in values, knowing, and power. This creates a derangement that we feel in civics, democracy, and everyday life.

  3. Drivers — These ruptures are more than mere politics and norms: they arise from a violent confluence: a “phase change” in our relationship to the biosphere, the social sphere, and technology. This creates an “age of consequences” in which the presumption of a stable, predictable world is gone.

  4. Institutions — In this deranged moment, institutions — our intermediaries of culture and power (such as the “cultural sector”, broadly defined) — must be our allies in natality, building our capacity to create new worlds through actions and speech. Without this we are stranded between the world that has passed and the one that will, by necessity, be born.

  5. The Global Street — This drama of revolution, rupture, derangement, and rebirth is now playing out on the global street of global cities. The future will be won or lost here, where “culture” helps to constitute, or fails to constitute, our right to stand together as authors of a better world.

These points build on the elegant, powerful ideas of Amitav Ghosh, Saskia Sassen (the global city, global street), Hannah Arendt (natality and places of appearance), and Donella Meadows (systems change), among others.

More on LinkedIn (link)…

Phone-free childhood

children walking down a shopping street
In 2023, the Irish seaside town just south of Dublin [Greystone] launched a grass-roots initiative led by local parents, school principals and community members to loosen the grip of technology on their younger kids by adopting a voluntary “no smart devices” code and supporting it with workshops and social events...
“It was one of the first places that took collective action,” said Daisy Greenwell, who co-founded Britain’s Smartphone Free Childhood movement later the same year — inspired, in part, by Greystones. “It made me think that we could shift the culture here, too.”
A Phone-Free Childhood? One Irish Village Is Making It Happen. By Sally McGranePhotographs by Therese Aherne, New York Times, March 25, 2026.

Children and Young People's Assembly On Biodiversity Loss

Some members of the 2022 Assembly. Photo: https://cyp-biodiversity.ie/resources/

In October 2022, Ireland held its first Children and Young People’s Assembly on Biodiversity Loss. Over two weekends, the Assembly brought together 35 randomly selected members aged 7–17 from across Ireland to explore, discuss and create calls to action on how to protect and restore biodiversity in Ireland.

To make sure the Children and Young People’s Assembly was designed in a way that worked for children and young people, the project was created and facilitated by an intergenerational team consisting of a Young Advisory Team and an independent research consortium.

The Young Advisory Team comprised nine children and young people from across Ireland, aged 8-16. The research consortium included experts in children’s participation, deliberative democracy, and biodiversity from Dublin City University, University College Cork, and terre des hommes, an international organisation with a focus on children’s environmental rights.

The Children and Young People’s Assembly on Biodiversity Loss was commissioned by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage.
Children and Young People's Assembly on Biodiversity Loss - About. This blog post from DemocracyNext (March 2026) features background and interviews with some of the organizers and participants (Ireland, and related initiatives in Switzerland)

Virtue

Every social theory undergirding Trumpism has been broken on the steel of Minnesotan resolve. The multiracial community in Minneapolis was supposed to shatter. It did not. It held until Bovino was forced out of the Twin Cities with his long coat between his legs.

The secret fear of the morally depraved is that virtue is actually common, and that they’re the ones who are alone. In Minnesota, all of the ideological cornerstones of MAGA have been proved false at once. Minnesotans, not the armed thugs of ICE and the Border Patrol, are brave. Minnesotans have shown that their community is socially cohesive — because of its diversity and not in spite of it. Minnesotans have found and loved one another in a world atomized by social media, where empty men have tried to fill their lonely soul with lies about their own inherent superiority. Minnesotans have preserved everything worthwhile about “Western civilization,” while armed brutes try to tear it down by force.
Adam Serwer's dispatch from Minnesota (The Atlantic, 26 January 2026) as referenced by Ezra Klein, Trump Has Overwhelmed Himself, NY Times, 1 February 2026.

If you're serious about making history

I want to invoke the deathless quote given to [journalist Ron] Suskend in 2004 in which the logic the history-making, the logic of this project of power was laid out:

The aide [to President George W. Bush] said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued.

“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”


There's a liberal knee-jerk in us which is just repelled by this language, by this refusal of the fact-based reality. But if you're serious about making history this is exactly how you act. This is exactly how you act. This is the template of how you would understand the process of making change. Of course, it ends in disaster…
Adam Tooze, in his 2026 lecture Electrostates, Petrostates and the New Cold War, citing Ron Suskind's 2004 story in the New York Times' magazine, Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush.

Reference slides for Hands On! conference talk: Youth, Megacities, and the New Museums of the Future

Update: Here’s a shorter set of slides — a kind of prequel focusing in on the revolution and drivers that necessitate a change in cultural strategies. Liverpool Thesis: What drives "culture" at a moment of extraordinary Change?

//

A long, excruciatingly comprehensive set of “reference slides” (and work in progress) from my short, November 2025 talk at the Hands On! Conference at the Eureka! National Children’s Museum conference Liverpool.

At some point I’ll boil this down into a shorter, 20-30 slide summary but for now I wanted to try to lay out the whole case in all its glory, warts and all.

Download/view

PDF
Slides (via Google Slides)

Contents

  1. Intro/overview: Why build a children’s museum (or any kind of museum) now?

  2. Interlude — 3 stories

  3. The world we live in — cultural revolution and axiological rifts

  4. What does this mean for young people?

  5. What does this mean for our institutions and practice?

  6. Change is possible

  7. Questions I often get at this point

  8. Helpful frameworks (tools for thinking and working together)

    The Big Frikin’ Wall; Zuckerman Quadrant; Think Big, Start Small, Move Fast, Activism, & etc

    The emergence of children’s rights and the rights of future generations

    Leverage Points in a System (Donella Meadows)

  9. Examples - real-world inspiration (~60 projects)

  10. Current work – bringing the vision to scale

  11. Conclusion

More context (cross post from LinkedIn)

Reference slides for "Youth, Megacities, and the New Museums of Tomorrow" — a short talk I gave at the Hands On! - International Association of Children in Museums conference in Liverpool in November.

I'm arguing here...laying out the evidence and rationale...that we are in the midst of a cultural revolution — a "phase change" in the functioning of the world — that is driving a wedge between young people and their human right to shape and enjoy a common future.

These changes affect all of us profoundly, and in response, I think that children's museums — all knowledge, memory, and "cultural" institutions, really — need to dramatically reconsider their purpose, scope and methods.
We need to up our game, and fast.

As Greta Thunberg told the European Parliament in 2019, seemingly a thousand years ago, "Everyone and everything has to change. But the bigger your platform, the bigger your responsibility. The bigger your carbon footprint, the bigger your moral duty."

C02 is a big driver of the cultural revolution(s) and "rift" but as I see it, the main challenge lies in the combinatory effects of climate change and biodiversity loss, digital (Big Tech) and biotech, concentrations of wealth and power, and the advent of a new kind of change (accelerating, tipping points, delays between cause and effect) that exceeds our human capacity to think, learn, and make wise decisions in an era that needs, as Zeynep Tufekci says, "all the sociological imagination we can get."

That's *a lot* to take in. It's a big problem space and a big "ask" to figure out a new way to work and act in such an uncertain time. But the great systems thinker Donella Meadows observed that paradigms in transition are actually easier to change.

And the good news is that there are loads of inspiring, practical examples to draw from for those who have the curiosity and imagination to think about our institutions and practice in new way. I've included over 60 examples of projects, exhibits, and strategies in these reference slides as well as a dozen or so frameworks and "thinking tools" that I've found particularly useful over the years.

What is the road ahead? I think it's to move beyond the idea that young people are small "future adults" to be educated and toward the idea that young people are legitimate and forceful civic actors with the rights, capabilities, and moral standing to shape the world on their own terms.

But to achieve this paradigm change, young people everywhere need dramatically better allies and institutions from the world of adults, and there are lessons here for all of museum and cultural practice.

"I came away both slightly terrified about the world young people are growing up in and inspired to do something about it" is how session chair Nick Woodrow, a Board member at Eureka! described my talk, and terrified and inspired is how I feel too ;)

Now is the time of monsters

“There’s this quote from the Italian theorist Antonio Gramsci that has been making the rounds a lot over the past few years. It goes, ‘The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum, a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.’

There’s also a looser translation of that last line that you hear sometimes: ‘Now is the time of monsters.’”
Ezra Klein, from How the World Sees America, With Adam Tooze. New York Times, January 30, 2026. The quote is from Gramsci's Prison Notebooks, over 3,000 pages in 30+ notebooks written between 1926-1937 while he was imprisonied by Benito Mussolini's fascist regime.

All technologies

“[Neil Postman’s] questions can be asked about all technologies and media. What happens to us when we become infatuated with and then seduced by them? Do they free us or imprison us? Do they improve or degrade democracy? Do they make our leaders more accountable or less so? Our system more transparent or less so? Do they make us better citizens or better consumers? Are the trade-offs worth it? If they’re not worth it, yet we still can’t stop ourselves from embracing the next new thing because that’s just how we’re wired, then what strategies can we devise to maintain control?”
Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves To Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, 1985. (via 20th anniversary Edition, published 2005)